Haitians from throughout the Diaspora were joined this past weekend by a number of solidarity activists at the Kongre Bwa Kawiman 2005 in Washington, DC. Eugenia Charles, one of the key organizers of the gathering, spoke with Derrick O’Keefe from Seven Oaks about the results of the weekend and about the current political situation in occupied Haiti.
Derrick O’Keefe: Could you tell us who was gathered this weekend in Washington, D.C. - from where in the Haitian Diaspora people came - and what general topics were discussed?
Charles: We had Haitians come from Philadelphia, Chicago, New York, New Jersey, Florida, and Haiti, in order to share knowledge and talk about the present situation, especially the increasing violations of human rights taking place in Haiti, the arbitrary arrests, the killings at the order of the de facto government of Gerard Latortue. This was talked about by all of our speakers that came from Haiti, and also Mr. Thomas Griffin was with us, an investigator and immigration lawyer who went to Haiti and produced a 61 page report with extensive information and pictures. (...)
On 28 December 2004, The Electronic Intifada featured an article, ‘Boycott as Resistance: The Moral Dimension’, by Omar Barghouti. While Barghouti argues that the situation in Palestine is “not identical to South Africa; that it is more complex, more multi-dimensional and even more sinister, in some respect”, he also acknowledges “that a sufficient family resemblance between Israel and South Africa exists to grant advocating South Africa style remedies”. Barghouti furthermore reflects on the “insurmountable hurdles” that South Africans faced throughout the anti-apartheid struggle. Finally, Bhargouti argued that the “militaristic establishment” of Israel would eventually weaken, if it were systematically challenged, just as it was in South Africa. (...)
Editor’s Note: Apparent movement toward peace in the Middle East will be proven to be baseless unless Israel and the United States quit stalling and take real steps to negotiate Palestinian statehood and an end to Israeli occupation.
NEW YORK—Officials in the Bush and Sharon governments have admitted they didn’t do enough to keep Mahmoud Abbas from failing when he was Palestinian prime minister in 2003. They say they won’t make that mistake again. Once past the rhetoric and the newly announced cease-fire, they are doing precisely that.
The Washington-backed summit between the Israeli prime minister and Palestinian President Abbas was only about easing the occupation, not ending it. Bush and Sharon still are stalling on final-status talks on borders, Jerusalem, refugees and the creation of a viable Palestinian state, thus undercutting Abbas’ credibility. They still are demanding, as a precondition for negotiation, that Abbas first dismantle the militants’ organizations and risk a Palestinian civil war. (...)
Democracy Now!In the first Israeli-Palestinian summit in four years, Israeli Prime Minister Gen. Ariel Sharon and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas verbally agreed today to end four years of fighting. Since the intifada began in September 2000, about 3,600 Palestinians and 1,050 Israelis have been killed in fighting.
David Smith-Ferri, of Voices in the Wilderness, answers the question of why there was a need for a Army Lt, a Reserve Captain, and a retired Army Colonel to hatch “the idea of soliciting donations of medical journals to help” Iraqis. This is a story of “American goodwill and generosity”, that “is nonetheless wrapped in irony, thick and layered.”
By any measure of meteorological activity, the last two years have been a season of foul weather for US soldiers and their families. One storm after another, and long-term forecasts for more of the same. Sent into Afghanistan and Iraq in the emotional wake of 9/11, commissioned to liberate people from tyranny and to protect Americans from terrorist attacks, they find themselves instead fighting a never-ending guerilla war, the moral handholds of which are as difficult to locate and as unreliable as a trail in a sandstorm. Innocent civilians, including children, are inevitably dying at their hands. The majority of Iraqis, the people they came to liberate, want them to leave. A majority of Americans believe the invasion was a mistake, and yet here they are fighting in its aftermath, forced into extended deployments, and risking their lives and their sanity. They fight for a Commander-in-Chief who fails to attend their funerals, and for an Administration that bans the photographing of their body bags. They are haunted by a ghastly prisoner abuse scandal, the ghosts of which continue to howl, and by the complete collapse of the Administration’s house-of-cards rationale for war. They work for an organization where a high-ranking official can talk about the joy of killing without being censored or reprimanded. In increasing numbers, they return home physically injured and/or psychologically traumatized. And all around them in Iraq, they are faced with irrefutable evidence of the futility of their mission: the unflagging resistance/insurgency and the unbreakable chains of Iraqi enslavement to poverty, unemployment, ill health, and insecurity, an enslavement which utterly discredits any claims of “liberation.” Who can blame them if their time in Iraq becomes little more than an intense game of survival. (...)
I joined the Army on August 27th, 2001, just two weeks before the terrorist attacks of 9/11. As naive as its sounds, I wasn’t thinking about going to war when I signed up. I was thinking about jumping out of planes, learning medical skills, and getting a tangible experience that would be somehow more "real" than the previous two years of college. Enlisting was totally spontaneous, and I never took time to sit down and consider how I really felt about war.
A year and half later I found myself working in a field clinic in Kandahar, Afghanistan. As a company of medics, my unit saw the worst consequences of war: mutilated children, traumatized civilians, dead soldiers. Even then, at least for the first few months of my deployment, I didn’t take time to consider the implications of what I was doing; I was too busy doing my job. It was the Afghani children that finally got me thinking. No matter how many casualties I saw, there was always a sense of universal wrongness when a 5-year-old child came into our clinic with a ragged amputation. "How are all these kids getting hurt," I wondered, "Why are people letting this happen? What’s wrong with this country?" (...)
The chain of violence and corruption that connects the United States with Iraq includes an airport in the west of Ireland. For more than two years, as reported previously in Counterpunch, the Irish peace movement has been trying to break the chain. Having failed, so far, to do that, campaigners now hope to turn Shannon Airport into the weakest link.
A group of activists, including several of the ’Pitstop Ploughshares’ who face trial next month for their ’disarmament’ of a US Navy plane in 2003, have called for American military war resisters to seek official refuge while their planes refuel and they are let wander through the lounges of this relatively small civilian airport. (...)
The U.S. government and most pundits have painted Iraq’s recent elections as a great victory over the Iraqi insurgents, who opposed them, and as a vindication of the Bush administration’s policy of bringing democracy to the Middle East. Amid the orgy of self-congratulation over the bravery of Iraqi voters, officials and commentators have ignored the most important story of the election results: a Sunni electoral boycott that demonstrates a level of support for the insurgency in the Sunni triangle that is far greater than what the administration has admitted.
The image of millions of Iraqis dodging bombs and bullets to vote is highly misleading. In fact, given the geographic concentration of the insurgency in Sunni areas, there was never any possibility that the insurgents could prevent Shiites and Kurds from turning out in great numbers. There were 5,000 polling places in the country, but only 109-2% of the total-came under attack. (...)
The Iraqi people on January 30th participated in their first truly free elections in more than 50 years. Voter turnout on a relatively peaceful day of voting exceeded all expectations. At some polling places, the mood turned joyous with Iraqis celebrating newfound democratic freedoms in spontaneous street parties. The elections were a resounding success and mark an important first step in Iraq’s transition to democracy.
These are the stories that will continue to emerge from the rubble of Fallujah for years. No, for generations...
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the doctor sits with me in a hotel room in Amman, where he is now a refugee. He’d spoken about what he saw in Fallujah in the UK, and now is under threat by the US military if he returns to Iraq.
“I started speaking about what happened in Fallujah during both sieges in order to raise awareness, and the Americans raided my house three times,” he says, talking so fast I can barely keep up. He is driven to tell what he’s witnessed, and as a doctor working inside Fallujah, he has video and photographic proof of all that he tells me. (...)
AINKAWA, Iraq, Feb 8 (IPS) - Zaid Suleyman, a 34-year-old taxi driver, sits in the administration office of St Joseph’s, an Assyrian Christian church in the Kurdish-controlled north of Iraq. He and his wife fled the capital, Baghdad, for the comparative peace of this region in September, and have been renting a room from an elderly church member ever since.
But despite the move, Suleyman has not been able to put the violence of Baghdad behind him.
"I have a sister living in Baghdad still, and two months ago her husband was kidnapped," he says. (...)
In a heightened display of saber rattling, President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have been saying nasty things about Iran’s "unelected mullahs."
This is apparently so we’ll be able to tell the difference between the theocracy in place in Tehran and the one coalescing in Baghdad. Although things are looking slightly brighter for Iraq after its debut election, it is still not clear why the United States has spent incalculable fortunes in human life, taxpayer money and international goodwill to break Iraq and then remake it in the image of our avowed "axis of evil" enemy next door. (...)
UNITED NATIONS, Feb 8 (IPS) - Over the next six months, the United Nations is planning to deploy a new 10,000-strong military force to monitor the recently concluded peace agreement in Sudan, which brought to an end the 21-year-old civil war between north and south.
The current African Union (AU) monitoring force in Darfur, western Sudan — which is expected to increase from about 900 to 4,000 — is ”not big enough” and its ”deployment too slow,” Jan Pronk, U.N. special representative for Sudan, told the Security Council Tuesday.
Pronk said there was a need for ”a robust third-party force” to maintain the peace in war-devastated Sudan. But the new U.N. force is to be based mostly in southern, not western Sudan. (...)
(New York, February 9, 2005) -The confinement of political prisoners in Iran together with violent criminals endangers their lives, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch called for the immediate release of all prisoners held for the peaceful expression of political opinions.
Six prisoners in Rajaii Shahr prison near Karaj, a suburb of Tehran, launched a hunger strike on January 25 to protest their confinement with dangerous and belligerent criminals who have assaulted and intimidated them. The six prisoners are Bina Darab-Zand, Arzhang Davoodi, Hojat Zamani, Mehrdad Lohrasbi, Farzad Hamidi, and Jaafar Iqdami. Prior to their hunger strike, Farzad Hamidi was assaulted inside the prison by a well-known drug dealer who threatened his life. (...)
According to recent news reports and as hinted in the president’s State of the Union Address, the neocons who dominate the Bush administration are gearing up for another pre-emptive military attack, this time upon Iran. The ostensible reason for such an attack is that the Iranian government is developing nuclear weapons.
In fact, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which regularly inspects Iran’s nuclear operations, has not found any signs of nuclear weapons. Although the IAEA has reported that Iran has produced enriched uranium—which can be used for either civilian or military purposes—such production has been halted thanks to a November 2004 Iranian agreement with France, Germany, and Britain. Thus, although it is possible that Iran might produce nuclear weapons some time in the future, this is hardly a certainty. Nor is it clear that the Iranian government has ever planned to produce them. (...)
In using the description ’knuckle-dragging buffoon’ I am of course referring directly (but far from exclusively) to the loutish Lieutenant General James Mattis, a US Marine officer who has been grossly over-promoted from latrine orderly. Recently he disgraced his country, his uniform and the Profession of Arms by boasting that he is a brutal thug. To remind you, what he said concerning his personal military ethos was : "Actually, it’s quite fun to fight them, you know. It’s a hell of a hoot. It’s fun to shoot some people, I’ll be right up front with you. I like brawling . . . You go into Afghanistan, you’ve got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn’t wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain’t got no manhood left anyway, so it’s a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them." These were his public words. They make me wonder what this man (I use the word loosely) might really think about in the depths of his diseased and malevolent mind. (...)
The slow and troubled journey towards a future normalization of relations between Japan and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK — North Korea) is shaped by two radically different visions of the past. Both Japanese and North Korean governments demand a "settling of accounts" for past history. For Japan, however, the "account" in question is the fate of the Japanese citizens kidnapped by North Korea. For the North Korean side, on the other hand, it is the older and larger history of Japanese colonialism in Korea. (...)
Actor and civil rights activist Ossie Davis has died. He was found in a hotel room in Miami Beach Friday, where he was making a movie. He was 87 years old.
For five decades, Ossie Davis had a distinguished career as an actor, playwright and director. Along with his wife, Ruby Dee, he was a renowned civil rights activist and an unforgettable figure in the African-American struggle for equality. (...)
When we look back at the past, people’s responses to perceived threats often strike us as disproportionate or simply crazy. Past panics tend to be quietly forgotten, or dismissed as embarrassing reminders of our capacity for group hysteria. But the kind of lingering fear that fueled extraordinary explosions of public alarm in the past still thrives today. Not only do we still have a choice, however, as to how we respond to fear-inspiring threats; our future may well depend on it. (...)
For those of us who have spent time on the college campus or have resided in a university community, living with questionable opinions of "radical" professors and students is not unusual. The Mighty Ado over the University of Colorado’s Ward Churchill would barely raise a ripple among those accustomed to cantankerous academic debate.
The same may not be said for many college and university administrators and boards of regents, however, when the spotlight of controversy (complete with angry phone calls, letters and e-mails) is turned on a campus by an incensed public imbued with near-lynch-mob outrage. Frequently timid, often advised by overly-protective attorneys, campus boards and administrators may react by giving in to a managerial "retaliatory" instinct that may stem primarily from personal irritation that their lives have been upset by uncomfortable controversy, like flea bites inflamed. (...)
1) The foundation of the WSF is international solidarity. The main reason the WSF is coming to Africa in 2007 is because we must give solidarity where there is the greatest need. Africa, taken as a whole, is undoubtedly the one continent where the greatest suffering of humanity is to be found in the world today. Capitalism has been exceptionally destructive in Africa: slavery, plunder, colonialism, apartheid, neo-colonialism, structural adjustment policies, etc. Africa has paid a very heavy price to facilitate capitalist development. That is why it is absolutely correct that the WSF must come to Africa just as it was correct to take it to India last year. Following the same principle and logic we cannot turn around and say the WSF in Africa must be held in SA because that is not where the greatest need is in Africa. To the contrary, SA is a relatively rich country in Africa and is classified as a middle income economy in the world. This is notwithstanding SA being the second most unequal country in the world. (...)
As a long-time professional journalist and labor activist, I have watched from the inside for thirty years now the constriction of the media and of the flow of information to the public-information which is critical to the function of a democracy.
We have reached a point today that half the people in this virtual Land of the Free think that it was Iraqis who attacked the World Trade Center, when in fact not one Iraqi was among the suicidal terrorists on those planes, where half the people in America believe not only that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but that the U.S. has found such weapons, when in fact there are none and were none, where half of American young people think that Social Security will be bankrupt before they reach retirement, where in fact no such thing will happen. (...)
BERLIN, Feb 8 (IPS) - With 21 feature films entered for the top Golden Bear award, critics predict competition will again be fierce at the 55th International Berlin Film Festival Feb. 10 to Feb. 20.
More than 600 movies are due to be screened during the festival’s 11-day run. Seventeen full-length feature films will be world premiered.
Africa is prominent in the main competition. In the U.S. production ’Sometimes in April’, film enthusiasts will be confronted with the gruesome civil war in Rwanda ten years ago. Raoul Peck’s film begins its investigation at the same place as director Terry George’s ’Hotel Rwanda’. But there the resemblance ends. (...)
Democracy Now!"This is analogous to stopping the circulation of all the books about Martin Luther King, stopping the circulation of all the books about Malcolm X," said Lawrence Guyot, a prominent civil rights leader with the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party. "I would call upon everyone who has access to ’Eyes on the Prize’ to openly violate any and all laws regarding its showing." We talk to Guyot about a national grassroots effort to screen "Eyes on the Prize" today.
Dili
Many people have commented about the first 100 days of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s presidency. One of his campaign promises, as we know, was to deal specifically with corruption — one of most acute problems facing Indonesia.
On the one hand, this promise shows the seriousness of SBY’s government, at least in public, in establishing good governance and democracy. However, he has ignored the issue of human rights violations committed by state apparatus over the last several decades
This includes crimes against humanity that took place in East Timor during the illegal occupation by the Indonesian regime. People might recall some of the other big atrocities, such as the killing of alleged Indonesian
Communist Party (PKI) members in 1965 and more recent cases like the May 1998 riots were thousands of people were killed. We can add to this list cases like human rights violations in Aceh, Papua and Maluku. (...)
[February 02, 2005]
After four months of virtual silence and tens of thousands more deaths, the January 31 release of the report of the United Nations International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur has prodded US spokespeople into repeating the charge that “genocide” is taking place in Sudan’s Darfur provinces.
However, if the recent past is any guide, Washington’s sudden rediscovery of the persecution of Darfur’s non-Arabic-speaking farmers will only last as long as it takes to pressure Khartoum to again tone down the worst aspects of its ethnic-cleansing campaign.
The UN report concluded that while the military regime in Sudan “has not pursued a policy of genocide ... in some instances individuals, including government officials, may commit acts with genocidal intent”. (...)
[February 9, 2005]
The Republican senators who have devoted their careers to mauling the United Nations are seldom accused of shyness. But they went strangely quiet on Thursday. Henry Hyde became Henry Jekyll. Norm Coleman’s mustard turned to honey. Convinced that the UN is a conspiracy against the sovereignty of the United States, they had been ready to launch the attack which would have toppled the hated Kofi Annan and destroyed his organisation. A report by Paul Volcker, the former chairman of the US federal reserve, was meant to have proved that, as a result of corruption within the UN’s oil-for-food programme, Saddam Hussein was able to sustain his regime by diverting oil revenues into his own hands. But Volcker came up with something else. (...) [page 21 | Comment]
Asia TimesGrand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani never had any doubts about what he wanted: use the much-cherished democracy of Americans to enable his people - the Shi’ites - to emerge as rulers of Iraq. Now, Sistani has called for Islam to be the sole source of legislation in the new constitution. But theocracy has never been an acceptable proposition in Washington.
Some Iraq veterans are returning home, only to face homelessness and mental problems. Meanwhile, the VA is MIA.
Herold Noel served his time in the military, including the first five months of the Iraq war in 2003 as a fuel handler for the military. He returned from Iraq in August of that year to Brooklyn, N.Y., hoping for a welcome and a helping hand from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), something he had been told to expect. That was not to be. (...)
in Kirkuk
Hundreds of Kurds flooded on to the streets in the northern city of Kirkuk yesterday firing weapons in the air and honking horns after the powerful Kurdish alliance came second in the Iraqi elections, winning 25 per cent of the vote nationwide.
Kurdish leaders will enter negotiations with the Shia coalition, which took nearly half the votes but lacks the two-thirds majority necessary to appoint leaders and pass legislation. Despite the strong showing and groundswell of support for greater autonomy in the Kurdish north the message from the newly elected leaders was more conciliatory. "Iraq is a mosaic," said a Kurdistan Democratic Party spokesman, Faraj al-Haidary. "It is a combination of all parts - not as an alliance with one party." (...)
in Baghdad
Suicide bombers struck in two Iraqi towns yesterday, killing at least 27 people, making it the most violent day since the January 30 elections and a signaling that after a brief lull the attacks have begun again in earnest.
The interior minister said it could be a further 18 months before the Iraqi forces could properly secure their country.
The first of yesterday’s bombers struck at the police headquarters in Baquba, a mixed Shia and Sunni town 40 miles north of Baghdad. At least 15 people were killed and 17 injured.
Witnesses said the bomber tried to drive a car through the gate of the police station but it hit a concrete blast wall and blew up near a crowd outside. (...) [page 13 | International]
The Ministry of Defence will accept liability for the death of Sergeant Steven Roberts, the first British soldier to die in action in Iraq, his widow’s lawyer said yesterday.
The move could pave the way for the families of other soldiers who have died in Iraq as a result of accidents.
[page 10 | UK News]
in Baghdad
Negotiations between the successful parties in the Iraqi election will start shortly and are likely to produce a national unity government dominated by the Shia and the Kurds, according to Hoshyar Zebari, the Foreign Minister.
In a jubilant mood in the wake of the elections, having vigorously opposed their postponement, Mr Zebari said: "We must not squander this wonderful historic victory. If we do not get it right, the consequences will be devastating." (...)
Translated by Haim Watzman
What would happen if the prime minister of Israel began his speech today at the Israeli-Palestinian summit in Sharm al-Sheikh by acknowledging the Palestinian people’s suffering? What if he were to declare that Israel accepts partial responsibility for that suffering? What effect would such simple and direct words have on the Palestinian public? What would Israel’s position in the coming negotiations suffer, and what would Israel gain?
And how would Israelis feel if the leader of the Palestinian Authority were to begin his speech by expressing his regret for the suffering that the Israeli people has endured? What if he were to accept, simply and directly, that the Palestinians are responsible in part for that suffering? Can such a moment be imagined within the thicket of suspicion and hostility that traps us both?
It is clear to all that a final peace agreement between Israel and Palestine must address the suffering that the two peoples have caused each other, and their responsibility for that suffering. (...) [page 7 | G2 features]
The year had begun auspiciously with the success of the Palestinian presidential election, but the situation still remained fragile, the Secretary-General of the United Nations said this morning at the opening of 2005 session of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian people. Now it was important to encourage the parties to deepen their political dialogue and match their positive words with action on the ground.
The Palestinian people had voted in large numbers for a candidate opposed to violence and committed to implementation of the Road Map, Kofi Annan said. The new attitude of cooperation between the parties had already borne fruit. Security coordination had been restored; the two sides were now in almost daily contact; and tomorrow, President Abbas and Prime Minister Sharon would meet in Sharm El Sheikh, together with Egyptian President Mubarak and Jordanian King Abdullah. (...)
[7 February 2005]
A trail of suspicion accompanies every announcement of negotiations concerning the release of prisoners. It is internal Palestinian suspicion, which has deepened since it turned out that the prisoners and their release were left out of the discussions on the 1993 declaration of principles that was the basis for the Oslo Accord. The mistrust only became more bitter during the negotiations for an interim agreement, when the release of every few hundred prisoners was preceded by exhausting negotiations, and when it became clear that Israel was not willing to release all the Palestinian prisoners arrested before the establishment of the Palestinian Authority. (...)
There can be no peace settlement or enduring cease-fire without the release of prisoners, Palestinian Authority Minister for Prisoners Affairs Hisham Abd al-Raziq said on Sunday in an interview with Haaretz.
"The Israelis must understand that this isn’t the only place in the world in which the resolution of a conflict between two sides is dependent on the release of prisoners, without exception," Al-Raziq said. "We have seen it in South Africa and we have seen it in Northern Ireland - that there is no chance of solving the problem and reinforcing the cease-fire without the release of prisoners."
Al-Raziq is slated to be part of a joint Israeli-Palestinian team that will draw up a list of prisoners to be released by Israel.
Hosni Mubarak’s initiative to hold a four-way, Israeli-Arab summit originally intended to include Washington in the show. The innovation is that Washington’s public nonparticipation did not prevent the summit from taking place.
After more than a decade in which Israelis, Palestinians, Egyptians and Jordanians have grown used to an American presence at every table where the terms "negotiations" or "dialogue" might be heard, the parties are arriving in Sharm el-Sheikh without their training wheels - or at least not near the table. (...)
Four leaders will gather in Sharm el-Sheikh today to confirm that Yasser Arafat is dead and to declare a new era for the regions. It’s the intifada’s graduation party, where Mahmoud Abbas and Ariel Sharon will announce an end to the hostilities and the start of a new road. Arafat apparently won’t be mentioned, not even in the Palestinian speech. But his departure created the new opportunity more than any other factor.
At the last summit, in Aqaba in June 2003, the American stage managers controlled the details. They dictated the speeches of the leaders and produced an impressive TV spectacle, which quickly faded in a new wave of terror and assassinations. This time Sharon is going to an Arab state alone, opposite three Arab leaders, and without an American babysitter. "No doubt the speeches won’t be as good this time," they said in Sharon’s office yesterday, "but we’re hoping the actions will be more successful." (...)
Key change brought about by accession of Abbas may have eased the way, but the real challenge now will be to maintain the truce
Condoleezza Rice could not have hoped for a better start to her new job as secretary of state. Barely had she arrived in the Middle East when peace appeared to break out.
The imminent prospect of the ceasefire also looks like a vindication for the Bush administration’s insistence that peace would spring naturally from Palestinian reform and the defeat of alleged state sponsors of terrorism, like Iraq.
Most analysts in Washington, however, suggested yesterday that President Bush and Ms Rice may have been the beneficiaries of lucky timing. Saddam Hussein gave money to the family of Palestinian suicide bombers but there is no sign that his fall curtailed the militants’ willingness to fight.
Meanwhile, the pivotal event of recent months was the death of Yasser Arafat, opening the door to Palestinian elections and the rise of Mahmoud Abbas with a mandate to make a fresh push for peace with the Israelis. (...) [page 12 | International]
in Ramallah
Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister and Mahmoud Abbas, the new Palestinian President, will formally call a halt to four-and-a-half years of armed conflict when they meet today at Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt, senior Israeli and Palestinian officials said last night.
The two separate but interdependent announcements that both sides intend to halt the violence, which has cost more than 4,000 lives since September 2000, is a major boost for Mr Abbas, also known as Abu Mazen. He had been pressing for a reciprocal declaration from Israel after securing agreement to a truce from armed factions a fortnight ago. (...)
in Ramallah
• Israel to announce truce today
• Hope after four years of violence
Israel and the Palestinians are to announce a deal to end more than four years of bloody intifada that has claimed 5,000 lives with ceasefire declarations today.
The Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, and the new Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, are expected to declare a halt to the killing at a summit in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh today.
Last night the chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat, said both sides were close to finalising the wording of a deal that would see Mr Abbas announce that a fortnight-long interim truce will become a permanent ceasefire by all the main armed groups on the Palestinian side. (...) [page 1 | News]
Pretoria
Faure Gnassingbe was sworn in as president of Togo yesterday after his father’s sudden death, to the growing condemnation of African leaders and France, its former colonial power who called the son’s succession unconstitutional.
Wearing a suit and a scarf in Togo’s national colours of red, yellow and green, Mr Gnassingbe, 39, took his oath in front of judges and MPs. Western diplomats did not attend the ceremony in the capital, Lomé.
He was named as successor by the army on Saturday, hours after the death of his father, Gnassingbe Eyadema, 69. (...) [page 15 | International]