In the last few days there has been widespread and grossly inaccurate media coverage concerning my analysis of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, coverage that has resulted in defamation of my character and threats against my life. What I actually said has been lost, indeed turned into the opposite of itself, and I hope the following facts will be reported at least to the same extent that the fabrications have been. (...)
January 31, 2005
When it comes to left and right, meaning the respective voices of sanity and dementia, we’re meant to keep two sets of books.
Start with sanity, in the form of Ward Churchill, a tenured professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder and, until a few minutes ago of this writing, chairman of the department of ethnic studies. Churchill is known nationally as an eloquent radical writer on Native American issues.
Back in 2001, after 9/11, Churchill wrote an essay called "Some Push Back," making the simple point, in his words, that "if U.S. foreign policy results in widespread death and destruction abroad, we cannot feign innocence when some of that destruction is returned." (...)
[February 1, 2005]
I published an essay, "America and Islam: Seeking Parallels," in Counterpunch on December 29, 2004. A day later, I began to receive nasty and threatening emails, all at once. These were orchestrated by a www.littlegreenfootballs.com. Shortly thereafter, other right-wing websites got into act, posting excerpts from the essay; these included jihadwatch.org, campuswatch.org, frontpagemag.com, freerepublic.com, etc. The messages posted on these websites were equally vicious, and some of them, containing explicit death threats, were ’kindly’ forwarded to me.
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission urged President Hamid Karzai the other day to bring war criminals to justice after a long era of human rights abuses.
[January 31, 2005]
Given the current controversy surrounding the euphoric critical consensus about Alexander Payne’s wonderful film Sideways — many contend that the picture has been unanimously praised by critics not because of its innate value, but rather because its focus on the life of a tragic, unrealized middle-aged male writer who goes to bed with a beautiful woman appeals specifically to the demographic of unrealized middle-aged male writers who review films, and want to go to bed with beautiful women — I feel as though I ought to explain why Barry Crimmins’s new book, Never Shake Hands with a War Criminal, might appeal specifically only to me. (...)
FindLaw columnist and human rights attorney Joanne Mariner argues that the United States is wrong to oppose the recommendation of the U.N.’s special commission on the crisis in Darfur. (The special commission has advised that the situation immediately be referred to the International Criminal Court, which could initiate prosecutions of the perpetrators.) Mariner contends that even if the U.S. will not drop its general opposition to the ICC, it should make an exception in light of what it has admitted is ongoing genocide.
Democracy Now!A new United Nations report on Sudan criticized the government and its militia of systematically abusing and killing civilians in the country’s western Darfur region. But the report concludes that the Sudanese government did not pursue a policy of genocide.
The Fifth Annual World Social Forum (WSF) held in Porto Alegre, Brazil from January 26-31 garnered almost no media coverage in the United States. Timed to coincide with the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the WSF drew 155,000 activists from 135 countries, who assembled to challenge Bush’s agenda.
The weeklong happening, called "Another World Is Possible," kicked off with a "march for peace." An estimated 200,000 people, many with turbans or indigenous clothing, carried bright flags and marched to the beat of omnipresent drums. Several bore posters with pictures of Bush ("The World’s No. 1 Terrorist"). The mood was festive but purposeful as old and young, black, brown, yellow and white, prepared to strategize about how to create a just and peaceful world.
One of the most compelling speakers at the WSF was John Perkins, a former CIA operative and self-described economic hit man for U.S. imperialism. It was Perkins’ job to meet with a leader of a targeted country and encourage him to accept a large loan for a project that both the CIA and the leader knew the country could not afford. The money would go to a bank in the United States and U.S. corporations would get the contract to do the job. The country was then beholden to the United States, manipulated to support U.S. policy and make its natural resources available to U.S. corporations. This is the model of "neo-liberalism." (...)
WASHINGTON, Feb 2 (IPS) - On the eve of this week’s Group of Seven (G-7) Finance Ministers meeting in London, U.S. development groups are calling on the George W. Bush administration to support full, unconditional, and immediate debt relief for more than three dozen of the world’s poorest nations.
Jubilee USA network, a coalition of 60 groups, and Africa Action delivered the message directly Tuesday, presenting U.S. Treasury officials with the signatures of more than 3,000 people on a petition that characterises the debts as ”illegitimate” and calls for no-strings-attached cancellation.
Treasury Secretary John Snow will be representing the administration at the Feb. 4-5 talks. (...)
Israel’s Attorney-General has ordered Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s Government not to use a five-decade-old law to seize east Jerusalem property owned by Palestinians living elsewhere in the West Bank.
Menachem Mazuz called the Government’s seizure policy legally indefensible and also cited political considerations in his ruling.
"This decision cannot stand," Mr Mazuz said in a lengthy statement released on Tuesday. He cited "many legal difficulties", including "Israel’s obligations according to the rules of customary international law". (...)
Palestinian journalists go against all odds to bear witness to the Israeli occupation army’s crimes, for their people and for the world, writes Serene Assir from Gaza and the West Bank
In a report issued on the fourth anniversary of the start of the Al-Aqsa Intifada, the International Press Institute stated: "Since the beginning of the violent crisis in Israel, the occupied Palestinian territories, and the areas under Palestinian Authority rule on 28 September, 2000, journalists have featured heavily among the victims. So far, 12 have been killed, scores injured, some for life." (...)
[27 January - 2 February 2005 | Issue No. 727]
This article was first published in The Jordan Times.
Every time a Gazan father faints as he watches his family home demolished; every time a Jew, Muslim or Christian is violently attacked by armed Israelis because they are non-violently protesting the separation wall; every time a rain of Israeli army bullets flies into the body of a young child on her way to school; every time a young Palestinian man is made to play violin by Israeli soldiers, or a pregnant woman dies at a checkpoint, Jews like us must speak out. (...)
Though the film is called The Syrian Bride, the story is about much more than the title character, Mona. Played by Clara Khoury (who also starred as a bride in Rana’s Wedding), Mona doesn’t have very many lines in this new Israeli film. Instead, she acts as a gravitational body that the main themes of the film orbit around — her sister Amal’s unhappy marriage, the problems of tribal politics, the Israeli occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights, and on a more abstract level, the broader political conflict in the Middle East.
Mao and his Thoughts are proving more lethal in India than Osama bin Laden and his fatwas. The Maoists will be the ultimate beneficiaries of the coup in Nepal and not the King, the political leadership or the people.
The King strikes,’ headlined the New Indian Express of Chennai its story on the coup staged by King Gyanendra of Nepal after sacking his own hand-picked stooge Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba on February 1, 2005.
A more appropriate heading one cannot think of. Strike he did, and with what vengeance! His coup resembled more those of the past in some countries of West Asia and Latin America than nearer home in Pakistan. Pakistani military dictators, even while seizing power, try to maintain at least a semblance of propriety, but not the King of Nepal. (...)
BANGKOK, Feb 2 (IPS) - In May 1990, the winds of change that began with the collapse of the Berlin Wall and freeing of South Africa’s Nelson Mandela, had reached the Himalayan Hindu kingdom of Nepal. The role of the god-king - the incarnation of Lord Vishnu - was challenged.
King Birendra Bir Bikram Shah’s role, as a divine being whose presence should be worshipped and preemptory command obeyed without question, was about to end.
In the face of huge pro-democracy demonstrations, King Birendra abandoned his absolute powers without any real struggle and agreed to be a constitutional monarch. Though he could have called in the Royal Nepal Army whose loyalty to the monarchy was unquestioned, the king chose not to. And it rankled the minds of many at the time on why Birendra did not do so. (...)
The key to the future of Nepal after the dismissal of the Deuba Government and the imposition of Emergency lies in a question that everyone finds difficult to answer at this stage: how would the Nepali citizen respond to this act of the King? The state of censorship and the absence of any reliable information from within Nepal have made this question all the more difficult to answer. In the absence of reliable information we all tend to fall back on stereotypes and prejudices. All those who are concerned about these developments and the fate of democracy in our neighbourhood will wonder about some tough questions: do the ordinary Nepalis care for democracy? Are they not disgusted with the way democracy has worked in the country ever since 1990? Are they not fed up with the Maoist insurgency and would they not welcome any attempt to resolve the matter, no matter who does it? And finally, isn’t the Nepalis’ regard for the institution of monarchy still strong enough for them to accept the latest adventure by the current King? (...) [Feb 03, 2005]
One of the least reported aspects of the U.S. occupation of Iraq is the oftentimes indiscriminate use of air power by the American military. The Western mainstream media has generally failed to attend to the F-16 warplanes dropping their payloads of 500, 1,000, and 2,000-pound bombs on Iraqi cities — or to the results of these attacks. While some of the bombs and missiles fall on resistance fighters, the majority of the casualties are civilian — mothers, children, the elderly, and other unarmed civilians. (...)
Tens of thousands of people were unable to vote in the historic weekend election because some polling places ran out of ballots, Iraq’s interim President, Ghazi al-Yawer, admitted yesterday.
The admission came as the Shiite leader, Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, claimed victory for his United Iraqi Alliance in the poll - days before the results are officially due.
"The United Iraqi Alliance scored a sweeping victory. We know that the majority ... cast their vote for the alliance," Mr Hakim said.
Mr Yawer said "tens of thousands were unable to cast their votes because of the lack of ballots in Basra, Baghdad and Najaf".
Election officials acknowledged that irregularities had kept people away, including in the volatile northern and heavily Sunni city of Mosul. Security worries in Sunni areas were partly to blame for the fact that some booths did not open and ballots were too few, they said. (...)
US effort to silence communications from the ’axis of evil’ may stem liberal expression as well.
NICOSIA, CYPRUS - Iran’s dissenting and liberal voices, reeling from a crackdown in cyberspace by their country’s old guard, now worry about a new challenge from an unexpected quarter: America. (...)
Despite bouts of polemics, Washington is engaged in initiatives to engage Iran in dialogue over its nuclear program, including moves to coordinate US policies toward Tehran with the Gulf states. On its side, Iran also knows what is at stake, and is fully cognizant of the United States’ seriousness regarding nuclear non-proliferation.
The United States has spent nearly $200 billion dollars and lost more than 1,400 American lives so that Iraqis could attempt representative government. If, by some miracle, the result is a democratic and pro-western Iraq, President Bush can claim Mission Accomplished, for real.
But a great deal must still break right before that banner can be unfolded. One risk is endless insurgency and prolonged occupation. Another is that Iraqis will indeed elect a popular government, but not one that we like, or that likes us. (...)
The cartoon on the letters page of the January 26 Sydney Morning Herald featured an Iraqi casting his vote in the US-engineered January 30 election saying “Give me liberty or give me death”, while behind him a masked suicide bomber preparing to detonate responded “Ok”. The message of the cartoon, captioned “Freedom of choice”, was clear: Having suffered decades of Saddam Hussein’s brutal dictatorship, Iraqis’ first chance for a “democratic” election, brought about by their US-led “liberators”, has been undermined by “terrorists”.
He writhes in pain, moaning with every other breath. The Iraqi police colonel’s chest is covered in bandages, his legs from the knees down nearly completely hidden from view due to thick bandages holding what is left of his shins together.
“We gave him first aid and requested a transfer because we don’t have any specialists left,” Dr. Aisha tells me, her name changed as requested since doctors are now technically forbidden to talk to the media or allow them to take photos in Iraqi hospitals unless granted permission from the Ministry of Health and its US-advisor.
And even then we are only allowed to talk with “spokespeople” at select hospitals. (...)
Let’s not forget that the reason Bush gave Americans for invading Iraq was not to battle tyranny. It was to protect us from a Saddam Hussein armed with weapons of mass destruction-which were never found, David Corn reminds us. And now that the weapon search has quietly been called off, administration lackeys still maintain Hussein posed a threat.
Even before the polls closed in Iraq, the Bush administration declared not only victory, but credited themselves with having orchestrated a historic event.
To be sure, an election in which Iraqis could vote for multiple candidates was unprecedented, and its significance was not lost upon neighboring regimes where small elite holds power.
Still, Bush’s index for success - that Iraqis could vote at all - is as empty as it is self-serving. As the occupying power the USA could hold an election whenever they chose, just as Saddam organized plebiscites to ratify his rule. Whether history remembers this election a turning point will depend on resolving Iraq’s fundamental problems, something that this election could not do. (...)
Since the night of September 11, 2001, when George W. Bush quoted Psalm 23 and declared the day’s events to be the opening salvo of a cosmic struggle of good vs. evil, administration officials and supporters have claimed that this president’s mixture of religion and politics is nothing new in the presidency. Just last month in speaking to journalists, Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson offered this viewpoint.
That simply is not so. We have the data to prove it.
What makes Bush distinct from other modern American presidents is not that he believes in or refers to a supreme power in his public communications. What sets Bush apart is how much he talks about God and what he says when he does so. The pattern is so clear that we guarantee Bush will invoke God several times in his State of the Union address on Wednesday. (...)
One thing that journalists and politicians have in common (besides an unhealthy desire to be noticed, that is) is a lack of any sense of history. A politician will typically advocate policies that have had disastrous results in the past, without even making the tiniest effort to examine those lessons. Journalists, for their part, tend to live in the present and simply act as though the past never existed.
And so we have Iraq today. (...)
There are times when one must give the devil his due. The American media is capable of carrying out extraordinary feats, turning lead into gold and an election held under foreign occupation into a victory for democracy.
With near total unanimity, all the resources of this giant propaganda machine-the reporters and columnists, television pundits and talk-radio hosts, professional image-makers and spin masters-have been mobilized over the past three days to sing the praises of the Iraqi election. (...)
The former Python takes aim at Bush and Blair — without losing his sense of humor.
Terry Jones made his name as a member of Monty Python’s Flying Circus, writing and performing some of the most innovative and absurd comedy ever seen on TV.
Beginning in 2001, Jones — who has also written scholarly books about Chaucer and children’s books — has turned his pen on George Bush and his "war on terror". His new book, Terry Jones’s War on the War on Terror, compiles a series of wickedly satirical columns Jones published in Britain’s The Observer, The Guardian and The Independent during the past three years.
In one column, he takes pointers from Donald Rumsfeld’s approach to information extraction (“The thing is if people don’t say where they’re going after choir practice, this country is at risk. So I have been applying a certain amount of pressure on my son to tell me where he’s going. To begin with I simply put a bag over his head and chained him to a radiator...”)
Another column finds him losing patience with two neighbors he’s convinced are plotting something terrible against him. Because the police require evidence to act, Jones invokes Bush’s doctrine of preemption, “since I’m the only one on the street with a decent range of automatic firearms.” In others, he congratulates American forces for their success in making Osama bin Laden “look haggard,” questions whether a leprechaun or a fairy godmother feeds Tony Blair his strategy, and laments that a “war on an abstract noun” is unwinnable.
Jones recently spoke with MotherJones.com from his home in London.
Donna Mulhearn has spent the last week in the Palestinian West Bank town of Saida under curfew and military occupation with its people. The following are her last three letters and photos describing the effects of this military occupation of a small village from 27 January until 2 February 2005 (...)
I knew he was in trouble when those doves refused to fly off that Vatican windowsill recently. The image lingers...the Pope with his mouth open...seemingly botoxed...like Bob Hope’s was in his unfunny last TV appearance...cheeks akimbo...timing way off...and that little Italian boy by his side, shooing the birds who wouldn’t budge. It was as if they were saying, "Sorry, we donna work for you no more."
You gotta love those acidic doves. (...)
Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT) recently conducted a five-day training for Muslim peacemakers at the request of a human rights organization in Kerbala. The training was held in Kerbala at the office of the human rights organization from January 22-26, 2005. Four CPTers, Peggy Gish, Cliff Kindy, Maxine Nash, and Allan Slater conducted the highly participatory training.
Each day of the training had a different focus. These included: stories of non-violent peacemaking, the power of non-violence, the spirituality of non-violence, planning for public actions, and on the last day various smaller topics were covered including trauma and self-care, working with media and human rights documentation. (...)
[29 January 2005]
The dictionaries of the victors and those possessing military superiority do not define their occupation as `terrorism and violence.’
Until the mortar shelling on Gush Katif yesterday and Monday, optimism in Israel was on the rise. Sharon talked about a historic breakthrough in relations with the Palestinians; Palestinian policemen once again deployed in the Gaza Strip with their weapons; Qassams didn’t land in Sderot; there’s talk of a meeting between Mahmoud Abbas and Sharon; the Israelis are talking about gestures and releasing 900 prisoners; Peres is talking about jump-starting the economy in Gaza; and Mofaz and Dahlan have met twice already. The general feeling is that despite several wrenches in the works and despite the gaps that emerged in talks between security officials, the sheer fact there are talks attest to the improvement. (...)
Ha’aretzThe very sign at the entrance - "Horizons of Reform and Renaissance" - makes one wonder. The facility has been refurbished and redesigned, and has quiet motorized carts that bring visitors from one pavilion to the next. The activities also arouse one’s curiosity: lectures on literature and poetry, meetings with authors, gifts for guests. The international book fair that opened last week in Cairo, being held for the 37th time, can take pride in its improvements. When Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who as usual inaugurated the fair, asked how visitors to the fair would be protected against the wind and the rain, he received a satisfactory answer: there are wind barriers and awnings.
Some 27 countries - 16 of them Arab - are participating in this fair, to which Israel was not invited. The rewarming in relations between Egypt and Israel cools off when it comes to the Egyptian intellectual barons, who lord over the cultural ties and uphold the dictates of the Egyptian Journalists Association, the Egyptian Writers Union or the Egyptian Association of Film Writers and Critics, which forbid any contact with their Israeli colleagues. Anyone who dares violate these rules finds himself out of the unions - without the economic backing the unions provide their members. (...)
in Basra
American troops killed four detainees and injured six others to quell a riot at a prison in British-controlled southern Iraq.
The deaths, on the day the elections were held, drew an angry response from the Iraqi interim government which called for the troops to be put on trial if they were found to have used excessive force. (...)